Articles – Page 52

An Update on WFN Educational Activities

Wolfgang Grisold
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology and
Steven Lewis
World Federation of Neurology

Dr. Stefan Meng demonstrates nerve ultrasound at a peripheral nerve meeting in Vienna.

One of the most important and fascinating tasks of the WFN is education. This is an implicit task of a scientific society. Scientific societies have many other tasks, such as promoting science, exchange of knowledge, development, and cooperation. However, their most prudent and important task is to keep preparing for the coming generation and maintaining the present generation with education and knowledge to make them the best in their specialty. This ensures the optimal care for patients with neurological diseases.

Wolfgang Griswold

Neurology presence and workforce varies considerably around the world (Steck, Struhal et al. 2013) and also medical systems and educational systems. The WFN has had a number of educational programs throughout its history. Notably, the World Congress of Neurology (WCN) has served the purpose of fostering new development as well as educating neurologists in the field with the development of teaching courses to promote knowledge on a practical level. The World Congresses of Neurology has been doing this for a long time. As a whole, the WCN has been considered a primarily educational effort (Munsat, Aarli et al. 2009).

The WFN also provides Applied Research Groups, which serve to promote their subspecialty, for example motor neuron disease, neuromuscular diseases, neurosonology, and who, in addition to their scientific work, also engage in congresses and teaching courses. The Applied Research Groups are invited to engage on the structure and content of WFN teaching courses at each WCN.

WCN 2017
This year, the XVIII WCN will take place in Kyoto. It will be jointly hosted with the Japanese Society of Neurology. The congress will offer many educational components and disseminate the latest news and developments, as well as deliver many scientific sessions, teaching courses, and presentations and poster sessions, which all contribute to education in neurology. The WCN is a live event and is accredited by the EACCME for 8 CME hours a day, which is mutually recognized by the AMA and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, thus being evaluated by high international standards.

Several attractive opportunities are implemented at WCN 2017. There will be congress bursaries, which in addition to the waiving of the congress fee will offer travel grants. This is aimed at young neurologists and is supported by the congress and, also in part, by the professional conference organizer Kenes. This year, travel grants for 80-90 persons are planned.

For the first time, the Munsat¹ prize on education will be rewarded, named after Theodore Munsat (Medina 2014), who was very active in education and chaired the WFN education committee for several years. This prize will be awarded for the first time in Kyoto and will be an acknowledgement for persons involved in the promotion of education in neurology, and in particular educational activities within the WFN.

In addition to the scientific program, the WFN organizes teaching courses at several levels, hands-on courses, and educational sessions. The joint AAN-WFN Advocacy Palatucci workshop is a good example of a session teaching the skills of advocacy and leadership.

From the World Congress to Enduring Materials
Increasingly, the WFN also produces enduring materials, which are journal-published Congress abstracts, the Journal of Neurological Sciences (JNS) and eNS, the dissemination and organization of Continuum with the AAN for use in Continuum user groups, and, increasingly, the WFN website and social media.

Educationalists distinguish between live events and enduring materials. Enduring materials can be anything from printed, written material or media available as educational audio or video.

The WFN is in the good position to be able to use several publication materials, such as the website and social media, including Facebook, which among other activities also spread news and developments in timely ways and reach the groups of both young and middle-aged neurologists, and possibly also other health-related groups.

The JNS is the official journal of the WFN, and publishes material from studies, reviews, and cases, and has a large international participation. Two editor-selected CME articles appear on the website each month and can be downloaded free. The JNS is a continued success and is now edited by Prof. John England.

The journal eNS has been founded as an electronic open access journal, also serving as a platform for articles and cases, and has published several local features. It is meant to work in conjunction with the JNS. As it is an open access journal, fees for publication for open access articles are necessary, and this may be a hindrance in low-income areas; However, eNS is increasingly picking up momentum.

Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology is a product of the AAN and published by Wolters Kluwer . Graciously over the years, the AAN has donated print copies of the journal to countries in need, on the condition that workgroups are constituted, that articles will be read and discussed, and these conferences will be reported back to the WFN. The logistics of the dissemination of this program is done by the WFN, which includes the mailing, sending, receiving, and accumulating the reports. This is an ongoing success story and the WFN and the AAN are happy to provide this service. For an example of a Continuum program, see the recent article on the Moroccan Continuum program.

Books: In the recent past, the WFN also produced a book series, Seminars in Neurology, which was aimed at countries with low education standards and limited resources of health care. Despite being a success, they became outdated and have been replaced by the other educational materials and endeavors discussed in this article.

Video conferences are presently launched on the WFN website and it is expected that video conferences on cases or diseases held between several departments will provide a useful academic support for training. Increasingly, video-type seminars will be used for educational purposes

The public: One of our main aims is the promotion of neurology, which is much wider that any training and education we do specifically for the specialty. Individual health groups, committed nongovernment organizations (NGOs), and patients need to be aware
of neurologic symptoms, diseases, and emergencies, and be encouraged to seek help for neurological conditions for themselves or others.

The aim of public education is to spread information on neurology, raise awareness and understanding, and improve the fate of patients with neurological diseases. All in all, this could be called advocacy work for neurology. Indeed, this is the greatest gap we need to fill. At present, a good example of educational aspects are the Days of the Brain, which are topic-focused and try to improve awareness with regard to specific neurological diseases.

World Brain Day: Education of the Public on a Larger Scale
A major initiative from the WFN is World Brain Day which had its origins at the WCN 2013 in Vienna, and will take place for the fourth time this year at the WCN in Kyoto, presented jointly with the World Stroke Organization.

The previous World Brain Day topics were epilepsy (with the International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE]) and dementia. The day commemorates the founding day of the WFN and is July 22.

Members are encouraged to celebrate this World Brain Day and receive educational matter, suggestions for press mailings, and printout material. Last year, a virtual press conference was added for the first time. Press mailings, articles, and local activities are considered as measures for success and were observed and counted.

Patient Day
The WFN has introduced the concept of a Patient Day at the World Congress of Neurology, which is a day and a session devoted to patients, careers, and health groups for the purpose of spreading news and interest of the Congress. This was successful in Vienna and in Santiago, and will need to be continued at further congresses. Common diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, and movement disorders are usually selected, and speakers from the Congress give talks in an understandable format.

Other Efforts
Public Relations and Press Conferences also serve to promote the content of neurology and serve the purpose of reaching out.

Junior Traveling Fellowships
Junior traveling fellowships (JTFs) provide support for individuals to attend meetings and congresses. The applications can be made worldwide, and applications from low- and middle-income countries are preferred. The participation in the meeting needs to be “active,” which means a presentation or a poster should be in the program. A final report is requested, which might be used for publication in World Neurology. In the last years, an average of 30 JTFs could be granted per year. Applications are announced on the WFN website.

WCN Congress Bursaries
The WFN also offers congress bursaries to attend the World Congresses. The bursaries are devoted to younger neurologists, with preference to applicants from low- and middle-income countries, and include a travel grant and free attendance to the Congress. The number grantees allowed depends on the Congress budget. Over the last several years, 55 bursaries were given in Marrakech, 120 in Vienna, and 30 in Santiago. This year, we are planning for 100 in Japan. In part, this is also supported by the professional conference organizer, Kenes.

IFMSA
The International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations is an international association of medical students. The WFN has cooperated with regard to students‘ medical curricula concerning neurology, and also provides free entrance for two students at the World Congresses.

Courses, Caravans and Regional Teaching Courses
The needs for education differ worldwide, and they are not limited to live events and enduring materials. Courses with nurses, paramedical professionals and other health groups can be necessary, as well as small standalone meetings. Some of these meetings have been funded by the WFN with grants.

A good example of a continuing joint activity by the EAN and WFN is to hold teaching/training courses in Subsaharan Africa each year. Last year the course took place in Maputo, Mozambique in November, and this year it will be in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. These EAN regional teaching courses usually attract 70-80 persons, have a lean teaching staff of 10-15 persons, and attract trainees from Africa to offer scientifically valuable and highly interactive courses. This education of trainees and young neurologists is important, as they will act as multipliers for the future development of neurology in Africa.

WFN Grants are Available Each Year
The idea of WFN grants was first introduced in 2011. Grants allocate a sum of money for a purpose and a project, which in many instances are projects related to neurologic education. The website shows details about the grant application. The WFN is also eager to share and participate in grants with other scientific societies such as the International League Against Epilepsy, the World Stroke Organization, and the Movement Disorder Society.

WFN grants are awarded once a year, and applications are scrutinized and selected by a grant committee.

Department Visits
In past years, the WFN, jointly with partner members, has developed a program of Department Visits, where young neurologists from low-income countries can go and stay for four to six weeks to study the procedures, techniques, and observe the neurologic work at a major neurological center. This program was introduced for African countries.

Turkey started this initiative with us, and it has now been followed by department visits in Austria, Germany, and Norway, and soon Italy. Names of fellows and reports can be seen in World Neurology articles.

Both the participants and the sponsors have been enthusiastic about this initiative, which not only introduces the participants to recent developments and up-to-date procedures, but also introduces new insights into other medical and social systems.

This year, North America is joining, and the Canadian Neurological Society is introducing a department program dedicated to countries in South America. This will expand this successful educational tools in the Americas.

WFN Teaching Centers
The development of WFN Teaching Centers was successfully introduced with the first WFN Teaching Center in Rabat Morocco in 2013. The idea is to train neurologists locally with high standards, and also acknowledge the high standard of the training center. The first Teaching Centers were successively established in Africa in Rabat, Cairo, and Dakar, and offer both “full training” and fellowship opportunities, which include electrophysiology and epileptology.

WFN Teaching Centers undergo a process of evaluation, a site visit, and re-evaluation after four years. The Teaching Centers also need to be embedded in a publicly accessible university, along with facilities and services that include internal medicine, radiology, neurosurgery, neuropathology, and rehabilitation.

At present, Rabat has had one fellow each year for the past three years, and will start to train a second fellow this year. Cairo is now starting with one fellow and Dakar will start with both a complete training position and one fellow on epileptology.

The WFN organizes the Teaching Centers with regard to administration, and also supports the WFN fellows. The applications for these training positions are announced via the WFN website and media. A committee, consisting of members of the WFN education committee, the local university, and the regional society, scrutinizes and selects the candidates.

The Applied Research Group on neuromuscular diseases held a very successful congress in Toronto in 2016. This Congress, ICNMD 2016 (icnmd2016.org/), also yielded a share of profit to the WFN, and the WFN has decided to use this money for additional funding of two successive training fellowships in neurophysiology, which will take place in Rabat, and possible cooperation with the international society of electrophysiology is planned.

In the Americas, Mexico has excellent neurological training programs, several of which were visited by the WFN in 2016 and received the status of WFN Teaching Centers. In 2017, attempts will be made by the WFN to sponsor one trainee from South America to train in a Mexican Teaching Center, and the preparations for this department visit are ongoing.

A further potential development for the WFN Teaching Centers could be regular visits from an international professor, who would stay a few days, give lectures, and make rounds in the department for a short time (e.g, a week). This would also help the WFN to identify the needs of the Teaching Centers more clearly.

The concept of the WFN Teaching Centers is expanding, to potentially include a Teaching Center in South Africa, and already for Rabat a re-evaluation process will be needed. The WFN is also aware that a Teaching Center should be available in Asia, which, while having very highly developed and scientifically active countries, still has several countries with significant needs with regard to neurology training. This will be an upcoming project.

Vision
Education is an ongoing process of innovation and renewal, and the prediction of the future is not easy.

There is a need for research into the most efficient and best educational methods. Apart from practical learning, training curricula and the apprenticeship type models prevail. In addition, much time now seems potentially spent (and perhaps wasted) on routine work, and some training curricula, too.

There is no doubt that time and experience count, but could we not improve in the efficiency of knowledge transfer? It will be an important effort and task for the WFN to stimulate research in the field of education.

With the rapidly expanding developments in neurology, training curricula and teaching concepts have an increasingly shorter half-life. In addition to the need for trainees and practicing neurologists to accumulate new knowledge at a fast pace, we must also invest in mechanisms to investigate and assess which skills and knowledge trainees need to acquire (e.g., the milestones that were developed by the Accreditation Council for graduate Medical Education [ACGME] and American Board of Medical Specialties [ABMS] in the U.S. [Lewis et al, 2014), and also mechanisms to replace “old knowledge” with new (unlearning).

There are, however more tangible projects currently in our sights, such as the expansion of the WFN Teaching Centers, development of education on electronic WFN platforms, and the development of a global curriculum for training of neurology, aiming for suggestions with regard to the teaching and training methods, taking into consideration differences in local needs and resources.

Most important is the vision to increase efforts on public education and involvement of patients and patient groups. Awareness, prevention, understanding, and care for patients with neurological diseases need to be one of our major tasks.

References

Theodore L. Munsat (1930-2013). US neurologist, long term chair of the WFN education committee and also founding director of “Continuum.” See: http://worldneurologyonline.com/article/theodore-l-munsat-1930-2013-an-outstanding-legacy-with-the-wfn/
JA, A. “The History of the World Federation of Neurology: The First 50 Years von Johan A. Aarli.” OUP Book: 2014
Medina, M. T. (2014). “In memoriam of Professor Theodore L. Munsat (1930-2013): his outstanding legacy with the WFN.” J Neurol Sci 339(1-2): 1-2.
Munsat, T., J. Aarli, M. Medina, G. Birbeck and A. Weiss (2009). “International Issues: educational programs of the World Federation of Neurology.” Neurology 72(10): e46-49.
Steck, A., W. Struhal, S. M. Sergay, W. Grisold and N. Education Committee of the World Federation of Neurology (2013). “The global perspective on neurology training: the World Federation of Neurology survey.” J Neurol Sci 334(1-2): 30-47.
Lewis SL, Józefowicz RF, Kilgore S, Dhand A, Edgar L. Introducing the neurology milestones. J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 6(1 Suppl 1):102-4.

Call for Applications for 2017 WFN Junior Traveling Fellowships

By Steven L. Lewis, MD,
and Wolfgang Grisold, MD

This year, the WFN is again able to offer Junior Traveling Fellowships for young neurologists from countries classified by the World Bank as Low or Lower Middle Income, to attend approved international meetings.

Applications for 2017 would be most welcome.

There will be 30 awards; applicants should be neurologists in training or early in their careers, have an MD degree or equivalent medical degree, hold a post not above that of associate professor, and be no older than 45 years of age.

Candidates are asked to apply online via www.wfneurology.org/junior-travelling-fellowship-grants-form.

You will be asked to provide:

The name and dates of the meeting for which you wish to register
A CV and bibliography
A letter of recommendation from the Head of your Department
An estimate of expenses, to a maximum of £1,000, no excess will be granted

It is expected that applicants participate actively in the meeting (e.g. presentation, poster) that they attend. The submission of an abstract is encouraged. A copy of the abstract also should be included. Preference will be given to candidates who have not previously received an award and to candidates who intend to attend the 2017 World Congress of Neurology in Kyoto, Japan.

Applications must be received at the WFN office no later than Wednesday, March 15. All applications will be reviewed by the education committee, and the awards will be announced as soon as possible thereafter.

Seven New African Professors of Neurology Announced

By Gallo Diop, MD

Seven new neurology professors and four psychiatry professors in Africa were chosen from the candidates for the positions. Photo by Gallo Diop, MD.

Seven new neurology professors and four psychiatry professors in Africa were chosen by juries from French-speaking universities. Photo by Gallo Diop, MD.

From Nov. 7 to 15, 2016, the 18th biannual African contest for selecting new university professors was organized in Dakar, Senegal. After a tough competition, the assistant professors are upgraded to the grade of professor by different juries whose members come from all French-speaking universities and, depending on the needs, from other countries such as Belgium, France, and Canada. All the Francophone universities of the African Council for Higher Education (www.lecames.org), use this exam for enriching their faculty. They submit the candidacy of their assistant professors several years after they have received their doctorates. All the specialties of medical, pharmaceutical, dental, and veterinary sciences are involved.

This year, there were 172 successful candidates out of a total of 201 candidates from 24 universities. For neurology, seven candidates competed, and all succeeded. The awardees, in order of merit, are: Dieudonne Gnonlonfoun (Benin), Yacouba Mapoure (Cameroon), Paul Ossou (Congo), Thierry Adoukonou (Benin), Komi Assogba (Togo), Fode Cisse (Guinea), and Moustapha Sarr (Senegal).

This is a great achievement for local neurology training because six of them were entirely trained for four years, 15 years ago, at the University of Dakar, and one (Dr. Adoukonou) from the University of Abidjan (Ivory Coast). They also benefitted from one to two years of complementary focused training in France.

Gallo Diop, MD is a professor of neurology at the University Hospital of Dakar, Senegal, and co-opted trustee of the WFN.

International Conference Tackles Air Pollution, Emerging Medical Issues

By Peter Spencer and Jacques Reis

Speaking at the welcome at the Council of Europe were (from left) Professor Christman of the Faculty of Medecine, Professor de Seze of the Department of Neurology, Dr. Mengus of the COE and Professor Sandner of the University of Strasbourg.

Air pollution is an increasing concern for humanity. The subject urgently needs more attention from medical scientists and society alike. It has long been recognized as a major health threat with multiple impacts, increasing mortality, and morbidity. Pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases are well known outcomes. Brain impacts are an emergent challenge, as are related epigenetic changes and developmental issues.

For the first time, a conference tackled these issues in an inter-professional and translational approach. Basic researchers, epidemiologists, public health specialists, and neurologists assessed current knowledge and identified key gaps that mandate further research.

The conference, which took place in a pleasant Christmas atmosphere in Strasbourg, Germany, was organized by the Club de Neurologie de l’Environnement, NEUREX, and the Environmental Neurology Applied Research Group of the World Federation of Neurology

Prof. Grisold and Mrs. Reis, a local organizer, at the International Conference.

While compelling data are lacking, there is growing concern that continuous exposure to heavily polluted air might perturb brain development, increase the risk of ischemic stroke in adults, and even contribute to the development of neuro-degenerative and behavioral disorders.

The historical correlation between childhood exposure to lead from gasoline, population IQ attainment, and violent behavior during adulthood, coupled with experimental evidence of persistent epigenetic changes in the brains of lead-exposed primates, serves as an early warning of the dire potential effects of neuropollution.

That fine particles suspended in breathable air enter the brain is certain, whether directly via the sensory innervation of the olfactory epithelium or through pulmonary transfer to the circulation, the lymphatic system or other peripheral route. How the brain responds to neuropollution is the subject of debate. Is the particulate garbage removed without incident by normal physiological processes? Does its presence trigger a neuroinflammatory response? Is this a short-term event or can this lead to temporary or persistent brain cell dysfunction and damage? Can this initiate or exacerbate a neurodegenerative process related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease or Alzheimer’s disease?

Attendees enjoy the Alsatian atmosphere.

Given the extraordinary levels of ambient air pollution in many population centers around the globe, the ever-increasing trend of human urbanization, the rapid projected growth of some of the most populous cities in Africa and Asia, and the growing evidence for adverse health consequences of neuropollution, the Strasbourg conferees urged immediate action to curb air pollution and greater investment in research to establish the health effects and their underlying mechanisms.

The organizers thank La Région Grand Est, the Council of Europe, and the municipality of Oberhausbergen for their kind support.

Peter Spencer, PhD, FANA, FRC, is a professor of neurology at the School of Medicine and senior scientist at the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, both at the Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. Jacques Reis, MD, is with University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France, and is chair of the WFN Environmental Neurology Research Group.

The Profile of Neurology Has to Grow for Greater Recognition

By Raad Shakir, MD

Raad Shakir, MD

With the publication of Global Burden of Disease (Lancet Oct. 8, 2016), it is now clear that brain health is at the forefront of diseases leading to morbidity and mortality. Moreover, if we combine neurological, mental, developmental, and substance-use disorders (NMDS), then the group is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity, surpassing cancer and cardiac disease.

These facts, in my opinion, have not trickled to the policymakers, let alone the public. If this does not happen, then desperately required funding and support would not follow soon. Neurologists have to be more proactive in “promoting” the discipline across the world. In many parts of the world, our numbers are so small that the sheer number of patients overwhelms us, and our specialty is not recognized as a priority by governments. At times, we have to explain our discipline to the lay public, as the neurology profession is not instantly recognizable. In the eyes of many, being a heart specialist is easy to comprehend while a neurologist may not be. We may have to use the word “brain” more liberally, and stating that we are a “brain specialist” could be an option, which may perhaps be more recognizable. Although this does not cover those of us who look after the disorders of the peripheral nervous system, in my opinion, the issue of recognition of our specialty is much more important.

In this context, we have to understand that many other interest groups and those responsible for statistics come into play. As glaring examples, I will mention two. The first and most obvious is the issue of cerebrovascular diseases. Sixty years ago, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 7 decided that anatomically all strokes are diseases of vessels, and classified them under cardiovascular diseases! This served the interests of some groups, but not those who suffer a stroke or those who look after them. This will hopefully change with the World Health Organization (WHO) modernizing its International Classification of Diseases next year. This has led to the lumping together of the two most prevalent causes of death and disability, i.e. heart attacks and strokes. Both cardiologists and neurologists have clearly stated their opinion to the WHO that the two have different physiology, etiology, pathology, epidemiology, and clinical outcomes, and fall under different types of physicians. Both recommended rectifying this erroneous state back in 2011. We are now working closely with the WHO statisticians to remedy this anomaly while at the same time keeping statistical continuity when previous data are compared to new ones.

The second issue in the Global Burden of Disease is that it had to utilize diagnoses based on ICD10 that are flawed and rather outdated, and therefore attribution is totally dependent on the original etiology. Let me explain. When including statistics on epilepsy as an example, the Global Burden of Disease only included primary generalized seizure disorders and not any other forms of epilepsy! This means that perinatal injuries as well as all post-traumatic epilepsy in general are classed under injuries, post-meningitis/encephalitis epilepsy under infections, and so on. This may sound bizarre, but this is how the situation is in the world we live in. Moreover, neurologists deal with complications of general medical and toxic conditions, but the burden lies outside neurology. All neurological complications of diabetes, alcohol abuse, and toxic etiologies, as examples, are classed as due to the original issue, however remote. This leaves us with a major deficiency in our statistics and makes the majority of our work attributed to some other specialty.

One can understand the dilemma of statisticians producing classifications and the major pressures they experience. However, this rather rigid procedure may “simplify” various matters but it does not serve the accurate reporting of specialty-specific complications. Moreover, it will not help epidemiologists who are interested in ensuring that clinicians seeing such complications report and categorize them accurately.

Dementias are the leading cause of death and disability, and the incidence is increasing exponentially. The matter is beyond the health finances of most countries. Again, neurology is short-changed here. I do not think that it is recognized by many health providers that dementia is an organic disease of the brain. However, traditionally our psychiatrist colleagues deal with many aspects of the condition, and hence it is a joint endeavor between both disciplines. This is yet another reason why talking about brain health is in many ways a better description of all the disorders that we deal with on a daily basis.

When this logic is followed, there is no doubt that brain disorders are by far the leading cause of mortality and morbidity. We, as those responsible for looking after millions of affected individuals, must make our voices heard and be advocates for our patients. Some of these issues may sound obvious to some practicing in the more developed world, but it certainly is not the case in most parts of the world. Even if we look at the more developed sections of the world, we will find a huge discrepancy between various geographic locations, sometimes within the same country. Care provision is certainly not uniform, and it is our duty to inform the public of what is available and feasible in their localities so that the correct provisions can be made.

Globally, the number of neurologists is woefully low. It is most important to emphasize that our numbers are increasing, but so is the need for our services. This puts a huge pressure on us to perform efficiently with meager resources. Training is the way ahead, and perhaps as important is for us to emphasize that it is not enough to have neurological training programs without the support of the most essential specialties for proper service provision. Along with neurologists, health care providers will need neurosurgeons, neurophysiologists, neuroradiologists, reliable laboratory services, physiotherapists, geneticists, psychiatrists, immunologists, and nurse specialists. I could go on, but the point is made that we cannot work in isolation. When addressing these facts to governments, we have to clearly state the benefits of such integrated systems, and only then can neurological health provisions make inroads into the death and disabilities related to brain diseases.

I have so far stayed away from research, which is the cornerstone of our progress. This is performed now at varying levels in all parts of the world. Encouraging collaboration between regions and institutions is a core responsibility of the WFN, which we diligently pursue.

The profile of neurology has to increase, and our role in global health is being more recognized. The road is long, but the obstacles are not insurmountable. Most of this is in our hands.

A Brief Review of the Historical and Modern Aspects of Saint Petersburg Neurology and its Influences

Prof. Sergey Lobzin and Natalie Zinserling, North-Western State Medical University

Neurologists of Saint Petersburg and Northwestern Federal District

Saint Petersburg neurology has a great and deeply rooted history. In 1835, Prof. Shipulinsky was the first scientist who taught neurology in Saint Petersburg. Later, separately from psychiatry, neurology was developed by Prof. I. Mierzejewski (1835-1908). He worked with K. Westphal and R. Virchow in Berlin, Gudden, Leidesdorf, and Meinert in Vienna, and Broca, Ranvier, Claude Bernard, Vulpian, and Charcot in Paris.

The History of Saint Petersburg neurology was always associated with European neurological societies. Prof. Mierzejewski was a corresponding member of the Anatomical Society of Paris, an active member of the Society of Anthropology of Paris, a corresponding member of the Paris Biological Society (1876), an honorary member of Medico-Psychological Association of Great Britain, a member of American Neurology Society in New York (1882), an honorary member of the New York Academy of Anthropology (1888), and a corresponding member of the Paris Society of Medicine (1897). Prof. Mierzejewski made a significant contribution to the study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and, together with V. Betz, described giant pyramidal neurons in the fifth layer of the cerebral cortex and progressive facial hemiatrophy (1883), and was a teacher of the outstanding scientist V. Bekhterev.

(From left) Kseniya S. Krylova, manager of the Department for International Affairs, and Natalya V. Zinserling, head of the Department for International Affairs and assistant professor in the Department of Neurology, both of North-Western State Medical University; Raad Shakir, MD,WFN president; Prof. Alla B. Guekht, Scientific and Practical Centre of Neuropsychiatry, named after Z.P. Solovyov; and Alyona D. Kubina, manager of the Department for International Affairs, North-Western State Medical University.

Prof. Vladimir Bekhterev (1857-1927) was an exceptional psychiatrist and neurologist who learned from notable scientists such as I. Mierzejewski, Paul Flechsig, and Jean M. Charcot. Prof. Bekhterev was a founder of the neurological school and author of “Pathways of the Spinal Cord and Brain” (1896). About 90 of his students became professors, and 40 of his students headed various psychoneurological institutions set up by Prof. Bekhterev. He described a specific nosological form of “spinal stiffness” known as ankylosing spondylitis (morbus Bekchterev). He and his student, L. Puusepp (the world’s first professor of neurosurgery), opened Russia’s first clinic of nervous diseases with a neurosurgical department (1897). He set up the world’s first psychoneurological institute (1907), which developed in the North-Western State Medical University, named after I.I. Mechnikov. Moreover, he created 12 scientific journals and edited them himself. Prof. Bekhterev established several departments of neurology in educational institutions and initiated the foundation of the world’s first neurosurgical institute (1918) and brain institute. He made a number of eminent discoveries in the field of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, describing tens of neurological symptoms and syndromes. German anatomist F. Kopsch wrote, “There are only two persons who know the brain anatomy perfectly—God and Bechterev.” He brilliantly mastered hypnosis, using it in his medical practice.

Among Prof. Bekhterev’s students were two future neurologists: Michael Astvatsaturov, author of the evolutionary-biogenetic research method in neurology and founder of a nervous disease clinic (with 180-bed capacity) at the Peter the Great Hospital (now known as NWSMU, named after I.I. Mechnikov); and Alexander Triumphov, author of topical diagnosis of nervous system diseases. Prof. Alexander Panov was the first in the world who described tick-borne encephalitis (1935).

(From left) Prof. Alexey V. Silin, vice rector for Research and Innovations, North-Western
State Medical University; Prof. Alla B. Guekht, Scientific and Practical Centre of
Neuropsychiatry, named after Z.P. Solovyov; Raad Shakir, MD, WFN president; Prof. Sergey V.
Lobzin, Northwestern State Medical University; and Olga A.Kasantseva, vice governor of Saint Petersburg.

Nowadays, Saint Petersburg neurology continues to develop closely with foreign colleagues, exemplified by the annual conference Davidenkov Readings. This conference is organized by NWSMU and its Department of Neurology, named after S.N. Davidenkov. Academician Davidenkov is one of the founders of Russian neurogenetics.

The first Davidenkov Readings were held in 1998 as a small intra-city event. However, in 2016 the number of registered attendees exceeded 1,000 participants.

On Sept. 29-30, 2016, the conference was held under the auspices of the World Federation of Neurology (WFN), and was opened by its president, Raad Shakir, MD. He delivered a speech on the challenges of global neurology education, then noted the considerable contribution of Russian scientists. Dr. Shakir highlighted the importance of further integration of Russian neurology in WFN educational programs and fruitful cooperation in clinical neurology.

Alla B. Guekht, honored doctor of Russia, delivered a commencement speech on behalf of the Russian Scientific Society. Her presentation focused on changes in the sphere of neurology education programs in Russia, as well as participation with the WFN on educational programs and collaboration prospects with European colleagues.

Within the conference was the Russian-Norwegian seminar on multiple sclerosis and migraine, nine breakout sessions on topical areas of modern neurology, and workshops on pain relief.

Prof. Lars Bø, director of the Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre in Norway, presented a lecture dedicated to multiple sclerosis and advances in immunomodulatory treatment, and noted the frequency of demyelinating diseases in Norway. Prof. Bø shared his experience in cell technology usage in multiple sclerosis treatment, and problems and advantages in this sphere.

Marte Helene Bjørk, MD, of the University of Bergen, Norway, gave a report on headache and cerebrovascular disease. NWSMU and the University of Bergen are partners and conduct joint educational and training programs in the field of neurology.

Summing up the results of the conference, Dr. Shakir was impressed by the conference organization and the contribution of classics of Russian neurology, and discussed topics and visited with guests from various regions of Russia and foreign countries. He expressed confidence in strengthening of relationships between the Russian Federation and the WFN.

The Neurological Society of Saint Petersburg is keen on cooperating with foreign colleagues. Please contact the University Department of International Affairs at interndept@szgmu.ru.

Editor’s Update and Selected Articles From the Journal of the Neurological Sciences

John D. England, MD

By John D. England, MD

Within the first few months of 2017, the Journal of the Neurological Sciences will begin using EVISE, which is Elsevier’s new web-based editorial system. EVISE will replace the older system, the Elsevier Editorial System (EES). For more than a decade, the journal has been using EES to submit and manage manuscripts, but EES has gradually become outdated. We are hopeful that EVISE will provide an improved author and reviewer experience by enhancing editorial speed and increasing quality content. Since all of the Elsevier journals will eventually use EVISE, authors and reviewers will be able to access all of the Elsevier journals using a single sign-on. For authors, the submission process will be simplified, and proofing of articles will be faster. For reviewers, automated reference-linking to the bibliographic record will be available via CrossRef. Once deployment is accomplished, the journal’s EVISE page can be accessed via the “Submit Your Paper” link on the left of the journal’s home page. We expect that the new system will help both authors and reviewers streamline their tasks.

In our ongoing attempt to inform readers of important and interesting new developments in the journal, the editorial staff has selected two new “free-access” articles for our readership. The new selected articles provide a theoretical and experimental basis of a possible new treatment for carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning using methane-rich saline (MRS).

1. Methane has been reported to exert a protective role in ischemia-reperfusion injury of liver and heart via anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic activities. As these same processes are thought to be responsible for brain injury associated with CO poisoning, Meihua Shen and colleagues studied the effects of MRS in the brains of rats that underwent experimental CO poisoning. The MRS was administered intraperitoneally after CO poisoning. MRS was able to protect the brain from CO injury as indicated by decreased neuronal injury. Measures of lipid peroxidation, DNA oxidative stress, and inflammatory factors were all decreased, suggesting that the neuroprotective effects of MRS are mediated by its anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory activities.

Meihua Shen, et al., Neuroprotective effects of methane-rich saline on experimental acute carbon monoxide toxicity, J. Neurol. Sci. 369 (2016) 361-367. researchgate.net/publication/308017578_Neuroprotective_effects_of_methane-rich_saline_on_experimental_acute_carbon_monoxide_toxicity

2. In an accompanying editorial, Seref Kerem Corbacioglu comments on the potential significance of using MRS as a potential new treatment option in CO poisoning. He points out that CO poisoning is one of the most important causes of poisoning-related death and neurological damage in the world. At present, the only treatment for patients with CO poisoning is hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and this treatment remains somewhat controversial. Therefore, a safe and potentially better option to prevent the brain injury from CO toxicity is needed. Whether methane treatment in one form or another
will satisfy this need is an open question. The answer will require additional studies in animals and humans. The preliminary data would seem to indicate that such studies should proceed.

Seref Kerem Corbacioglu, New potential-treatment options in brain injury due to acute carbon monoxide poisoning in the future, J. Neurol. Sci. 369 (2016) 292-293. jns-journal.com/article/S0022-510X(16)30547-0/references

Report from the XLVII Congress of the Italian Society of Neurology

By Bruno Giometto

The Past President of Italian Neurological Society, Prof. Quattrone (right) presents an award to Dr. Luca Bello for his paper “DMD Genotypes and Loss of Ambulation in the CIRNG Duchenne Natural History Study,” published in Neurology.

This year, the Italian neurological community gathered in Venice for the XLVII Congress of the Italian Society of Neurology (SIN). Over 1,500 delegates took part in four days of intense updating divided into three plenary sessions, 10 refresher courses, and 21 workshops, in addition to teaching conferences and sponsored symposia. Venice has always been a leader in the treatment of diseases of the nervous system, and the appeal of the illustrious city has given the national neurological community added visibility in scientific, care provision, and educational terms.

At the inaugural ceremony, held at the Cinema Palace in Venice, 10 young researchers were awarded for first authorship in high-impact medical journals, while Dr. Luigi Bertinato gave a very interesting keynote lecture on “Controlling the Plague in the Serenissima Republic of Venice and Its Relevance to the Present Day.” He described how the public health system actually started in Venice in 1500 when, to curb the spread of the plague, which was decimating the city’s population, the first quarantine station was set up to isolate the sick, and ships arriving from the East (the Silk Route) were subject to rigorous control. (Read Dr. Bertinato’s speech.)

In the following days, all neurological conditions were covered, focusing on the most innovative aspects of the field and on translation into clinical practice. Special emphasis was paid to recently available therapeutic resources and care pathways, with a view to modifying the development of many neurological diseases.

More than 1 million Italians suffer from dementia, 600,000 of whom have Alzheimer’s disease. Every year, 120,000 Italians are affected by stroke, and 930,000 manifest residual disability related to the pathology. Finally, 90,000 patients have multiple sclerosis, 200,000 have Parkinson’s disease, and 500,000 are affected by epilepsy. In Italy, there has been a significant increase in the elderly population, implying a heavy burden in terms of care for age-related pathologies.

Particular attention was devoted to identifying the most appropriate models for neurological patient care at both the hospital and outpatient levels. Neurological diseases require highly specialized expertise and a multidisciplinary approach to management of the most advanced stages of the diseases. •

Bruno Giometto, MD, is the director of the Second Clinic of the Department of Neurology in Padova and a member of the Board of Arbitrators of the Italian Society of Neurology.

Main Topics at the XLVII Congress of the Italian Society of Neurology

Headache
Dementia and Aging
Movement Disorders
Pain
Epilepsy
Cerebrovascular diseases
Degenerative diseases
Motor Neuron diseases
Neuromuscular diseases
Neuroepidemiology
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology and Sleep
Neurogenetics
Neuroimaging
Neuroimunology
Neuroinfectious diseases
Clinical Neuropsychology
Basic Neuroscience
Neuro-Oncology
Neurotraumatology
Neurological Rehabilitation
Multiple Sclerosis
Sleep
History of Neurology

Brain Stones

By Peter Koehler

“Cutting the stone” is the title of a well known painting (1494) by Hieronymus Bosch (c.1450-1516), who died 400 years ago. The painting is displayed at the Prado Museum in Madrid. Another name by which the painting is known reads, “The extraction of the stone of madness or the cure of folly.” An inscription on the painting says (in old-Dutch), “Meester snijt die keie ras, Mijne name is Lubbert Das,” which in English would read, “Master, cut away the stone soon, my name is Lubbert Das.” In Dutch literature of the day, the name was given to a comical character. The theme was well known at the time, and the scene depicted by several other painters, including Pieter Brueghel (senior), Peter Huys, and Jan Steen. The idea of a stone in the brain made me think of a discussion taking place in medical literature over a century later.

The Seat of the Soul and the Pineal Gland

Figure 1. From Gregor Reisch (Margarita Philosophica cum Additionibus Novis, 1517) depicting the localization of the functions of the soul: sensorium commune and imaginatio in the first cell (lateral ventricles), cogitatio (reasoning) in the middle, and memory in the posterior cell (our fourth ventricle).

Looking at medical literature of the 17th century (and at CT scans nowadays), we know that calcifications within the skull really exist. An issue from this period that is of particular interest with this respect deals with the seat of the soul. Through the ages, the seat of the soul has been localized in various structures. In the ancient Greek period, mental functions, including memory, imagination, and thinking, were discerned. The concept of sensorium commune referred to the part of the mind that brings together the impressions from all five senses. It goes back to Aristotle, who localized the sensorium commune (the seat of the soul) in the heart, whereas Hippocrates and Galen localized it in the brain. For many ages, the soul, the immaterial part of human being, was localized in the cerebral ventricles or cells (Figure 1), in which model the lateral ventricles were considered one cell. In the first cell, imagination was localized; in the second, thinking or reasoning was localized; and in the third cell (our fourth ventricle), memory was localized.

Figure 2: From Descartes’ posthumously published Traité de l’homme (1664).

The localization of the soul changed in the 17th century, among others by René Descartes (1596-1650), who, as is well known, made a clear distinction between body and mind, and localized the soul in the pineal gland. In a rational way, he became convinced that sensory information from the body should convene in one place, an unpaired organ that he usually called “la petite glande,” the small gland. This is the place where he localized the sensorium commune, imagination, as well as thinking. It was the seat of the soul, he believed, situated between the beginning of the aquaduct of Sylvius that connects the (present) third and fourth ventricles. An important argument for Descartes, who stayed in the Netherlands for a large part of his life (1628-1649), was that this would be the place where the two images from each eye come together and form one image. The pineal gland is the only unpaired organ where this could take place and, moreover, it lies in the extension of the optic tracts. (Figure 2.)

A Stone in the Pineal Gland

Figure 3: Title page of Stalpart van der Wiel’s Observationum Rariorum (Latin edition of 1687).

Not everyone was convinced of this localization. One of the physicians, who opined differently, was the Dutch Cornelis Stalpart van der Wiel (1620-1702). He had studied at the University of Franeker (no longer existent), where he also wrote his thesis and practiced in the city of The Hague, where his father had been mayor. In 1682, he published his experiences of 40 years of medical practice in the book Hondert seldzame aanmerkingen, so in de Genees- als Heel- en Snijkonst [Hundred rare comments, in medicine as well as surgery and dissection; also published in Latin, Figure 3, and French]. He wished to pass on his experiences to his son Pieter, who would succeed him six years later. The 12th chapter is titled “Steen in de Pijn-appel-klier en Saadtvaten gevonden” [Stone found in the pineapple gland and seed vessels]. The text reads “When the body of a certain woman was opened by my brother the physician Johan Stalpart van der Wiel, here at the dissecting room some years ago, I have seen that a small stone, the size of a hempseed, was found in the pineapple gland…” Being aware of Descartes’ opinion, he concluded “that aforementioned gland cannot be the seat of the soul, nor that the most important faculties or acting powers (as has been made up by some) have their origin here.” Moreover, Stalpart van der Wiel argued that the gland “in animals, who seem to have no imagination, no memory, nor any remarkable powers of the soul” was found to be fairly large.

Indeed, it had been a well-known fact that the pineal gland could easily be missed at autopsies of human beings. Galen was aware of the gland, but most probably did his research in cattle. At a public anatomy lesson in Leiden (1637), Professor Adriaen van Valkenburg (Falcoburgius, 1581-1650) admitted, if requested, to René Descartes, who attended the lesson, that he had never found the gland in human beings.

Brain Stones

Stalpart van der Wiel’s case description is followed by an extensive discussion of contemporary literature, referring to his Dutch compatriots Reinier de Graaf, Job van Meekeren, Justus Schraderus, and the Danish Thomas Bartholinus. Stones had been found in several body parts as had been noted by many physicians. Several of them had written that these could be found in various places within the head. Stalpart referred, for example, to the German physician Johannes Schenckius (in Lithogenesia) and the French Isaac Cattierius (Cattier, physician to the king), who, in his Observationes medicinalis (1653), published a case of a stone growing attached to and under the dura mater. The list of references provided by Stalpart van der Wiel is quite large. A certain Kentmannus (lib. de Lapid in corpori inventis or book on stones found in the body) relates of a stone found in the brain with the form and size of a mulberry. Furthermore, the Dutch Theodor Kerckring (observ. 35) is referred to, who had found a stone the size of a hazelnut in the right ventricle.

Figure 5: Theodor Kerckring by Jurgen Ovens (1660).

Although I was unable to check all references by Stalpart van der Wiel, the latter book by Kerckring could easily be found. Theodor Kerckring (1638-1693; Figure 5), often working with a microscope made by his former schoolmate (at Van den Enden’s Amsterdam Latin school) Baruch Spinoza, became well known because of his description of the circular folds of the intestine. In his Spicilegium Anatomicum (Figure 6) of 1670 there is indeed a chapter named “Lapis in cerebro repertus” [Stone found in the brain]. It is about the 14-year old boy Johannes Nicolai Westphalus, who died June 8, 1667. At autopsy, hydrocephalus was found, probably caused by a white calcification of the right ventricle (Figure 7a and 7b).

Another interesting case referred to by Stalpart van der Wiel is that of a stone the size of a Turkish bean, which was found at the origin of the optic nerves and that had caused headache and blindness (referring to Zodiaco Med. Gall. anni 1, fol. 81).

Concluding Remarks

Figure 7a and 7b: From Kerckring’s observation XXXV on p. 76.

Although the scene on Bosch’s painting — in fact, not a stone but a flower appears from the skull — obviously is a critical depiction of credulity of common people on one side and quackery on the other. Several other interpretations have been given, but brain stones, as we know today, are not only a fantasy, and a touch of truth is present. In a recent paper, Celzo et al. (Insights Imaging 2013;4: 625–635) provide a pictorial review of brain stones with modern illustrations. They distinguish intra- and extra-axial stones. The first comprise stones of various origin, including neoplastic (oligodendroglioma), vascular (arteriovenous malformations), infectious (toxoplasmosis, rubella, etc.), congenital (Sturge-Weber syndrome) and endocrine/metabolic (Fahr’s syndrome) origin. The extra-axial stones find their origin in tumors (meningiomas) and exaggerated physiological calcifications. The authors conclude that “brain stones are more common than previously thought.” Although Stalpart van der Wiel was already aware of this, he would have been interested to read this paper and to realize that it is even more frequent than he thought.

Latest Developments of the European Board Examination in Neurology

Dr. Michael Ackerl

The European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) — European Board of Neurology (EBN) autumn meeting took place in Venice on Oct. 22, 2016. The main topic was the further development of the European Board Examination, which, in the last year, was under the lead of Prof. Jan Kuks of the Netherlands, who managed it very professionally. Nevertheless, new collaborations to improve the examination were, and are, in discussion.

At the Venice meeting, the board members decided unanimously to collaborate with the Swedish company Orzone for the next three years, which already helps many other sections of the UEMS in managing their exams. This guarantees that the principles of our exam stay unchanged (open- and closed-book questions, oral part). There were also negotiations with the Royal College of Physicians in the last year, and these negotiations will be continued for possible further collaborations. The board members also decided to create an examination task force in common with EAN and have a more intensive collaboration with EAN in training issues.

The next examination will take place in Amsterdam on June 23, during the EAN congress. Candidates from all over the world are welcome. Do not hesitate to contact us through our website.

Dr. Michael Ackerl is the Austrian delegate of the EBN.